<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clitoris and orgasm &#8211; happy accident, or intented for pleasure?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.the-generous-husband.com/2009/07/19/clitoris-and-orgasm-happy-accident-or-intended-for-pleasure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.the-generous-husband.com/2009/07/19/clitoris-and-orgasm-happy-accident-or-intended-for-pleasure/</link>
	<description>Daily tips on being a better husband.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 18:50:54 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: erikanderson</title>
		<link>http://www.the-generous-husband.com/2009/07/19/clitoris-and-orgasm-happy-accident-or-intended-for-pleasure/comment-page-1/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>erikanderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 13:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-generous-husband.com/?p=1262#comment-286</guid>
		<description>Mega Dittos there. About that last paragraph: in the not-too-distant past, the church severely dropped the ball when it came to its approach (its &quot;doctrine&quot; if you will) regarding sexuality, especially when it came to teaching youth. The only message received was &quot;keep it zipped up. It is bad, and it&#039;s not open for discussion.&quot; As a result, well, look how many former youth group members are raising kids alone. Not to mention, how many married couples struggle sexually because of the church&#039;s inappropriate handling of it. I think I was among the first age bracket (born in 1979) where youth groups began a healthier approach to this. I was taught &quot;sex is great when it is only in the context of marriage. Ask any question you want, but in the words of Song of Solomon, &quot;do not awaken love before it so desires.&quot; Yes, the adults have to actually come to terms with talking to their kids about sex, but marriages are healthier because of it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mega Dittos there. About that last paragraph: in the not-too-distant past, the church severely dropped the ball when it came to its approach (its &#8220;doctrine&#8221; if you will) regarding sexuality, especially when it came to teaching youth. The only message received was &#8220;keep it zipped up. It is bad, and it&#8217;s not open for discussion.&#8221; As a result, well, look how many former youth group members are raising kids alone. Not to mention, how many married couples struggle sexually because of the church&#8217;s inappropriate handling of it. I think I was among the first age bracket (born in 1979) where youth groups began a healthier approach to this. I was taught &#8220;sex is great when it is only in the context of marriage. Ask any question you want, but in the words of Song of Solomon, &#8220;do not awaken love before it so desires.&#8221; Yes, the adults have to actually come to terms with talking to their kids about sex, but marriages are healthier because of it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
